We build trust through reputation.

Rate this post
Whenever we discuss reputation management, one topic that always comes up is that of defamation.

Defamation – made up of slander (intangible, usually spoken) and libel (tangible, usually written) is a very specific kind of falsehood with a legal definition and legal burden of proof. You can read more about it specifically in our guide to defamation, here.

Typically, when it comes to reputation management, you approach a situation in two ways. First, you want to build more positive reviews. Second, you want to suppress and remove negative reviews as much as possible.

There are many different ways to go about dealing with negative reviews. You can reach out to the customer, solve their issue, and ask them to edit their review. You can flag the review as fraudulent and hope that the site hosting it will agree and remove it. You can respond to the review, telling your side of the story, and mitigate the damage.

In some cases – particularly when the defamatory review is hosted on a site dedicated to defamation, like TheDirty or PissedConsumer – the usual avenues for having the content removed or suppressed aren’t available. These sites typically ignore everything short of legal action, which means to get the content removed, you need to take legal action.

Legal action, in this case, means a defamation lawsuit.

Whenever we talk about turning to lawsuits, we typically caution you that it’s rarely worthwhile. In most cases, defamation on a site like PissedConsumer is not going to do significant harm to your reputation or your business. It can be disheartening or scary to see, but the majority of your customers won’t use those sites anyway. Additionally, Google has been taking action to make those sites less visible in search results due to the often-fake nature of the content they host.

A defamation suit requires a long and drawn-out legal process, and as with any legal process, that costs money. From court filing fees to lawyer fees to the time you spend on it instead of running your business, a defamation suit is very costly. The question is, how costly is it?

Note: Before we continue, it’s important to state that while we’re experts in reputation management, we’re not lawyers. The information we provide below is not meant to be legal advice. For that, it’s best to consult an actual lawyer.

You can find directories of lawyers online, such as Martindale, and search for specialties. Be sure to consult with a defamation lawyer about a defamation case for the most relevant information.

Personal vs. Business Defamation

While low-level or small-scale defamation can often be ignored as a business, if you’re an individual targeted by defamatory statements, it might be much more worthwhile pursuing them.

With a business, defamation can cost you customers, but it’s very rarely going to have a significant impact on your bottom line. As an individual, defamation can cost you a job, a relationship, your reputation, a position working with the public, or more, along with the mental anguish of knowing people believe such falsehoods about you.

Talking to Defamation Lawyer

In these cases, it’s generally much more worthwhile to take any action you can to fight back against defamation, up to and including taking legal action. Whether that means hiring a reputation management firm to deal with the issue or proceeding to legal action, something must be done.

General Cost Estimates for Defamation Lawsuits

It’s important to note that legal proceedings can vary widely from province to province and from situation to situation. Your actual costs may be lower or even much higher, depending on who is involved, the scale of the defamation, the lawyers and court systems involved, and more. We’ll discuss some of those factors below.

First, though, what sort of price range are you looking at? A few thousand dollars? Tens of thousands of dollars? More?

Defamation Lawsuit Cost Estimates

The answer is somewhere in the range of $10,000 to $25,000.

“According to recent surveys of Canadian lawyers, it can cost upwards of $10,000—$25,000 to take a lawsuit through the traditional litigation process and a trial. Small claims actions cost considerably less and often involve little more than a small filing fee and another fee to serve documents on the opposing side.

Typically in a civil lawsuit, it can cost $1,500-$5,000 to initiate an action and have a lawyer deliver a Statement of Claim. Responding to the opposing side’s documents and conducting examinations for discovery will likely involve another $3,500-$5,000. The preparation and presentation of your case at trial is likely to add another $5,000—$15,000 to your legal costs.” – LegalLine.ca

Note that this data is about lawsuits in general. There are no specific “defamation” costs, so the general cost of filing a lawsuit is roughly the same across the board, regardless of what kind of lawsuit you’re filing.

The largest award in Canada for a defamation lawsuit to date was awarded to an ex-pilot named Rick Fennimore and totaled $3M. While the number may seem extreme, the defamation in question caused him to not only lose his job, it left him without his sole passion and driving force in life, and largely unable to work at all.

The Cost of Winning a Lawsuit

One additional factor is the convention of awarding costs and disbursements to the plaintiff of a lawsuit when that lawsuit finishes. In many cases, if you sue someone for defamation and win, the court can order many possible outcomes. These can include:

  • The removal of the offending content.
  • An issued statement correcting the defamatory content and identifying it as defamatory.
  • Damages, to cover anything from lost wages to lost customers, pain and suffering, and other factors.
  • Court fees and other costs.

If you win the lawsuit, there’s a decent chance that the total cost to you will be $0 because the defendant will be required to pay your court costs and lawyer fees. However, this is only true if the court decides to require the defendant to pay damages and only if the defendant is capable of paying.

Cost of Winning Lawsuit

Often, even if the court awards you damages, it can take years before those damages are paid. Meanwhile, you typically need to pay for your court fees much sooner. Of course, situations vary, and we’re not lawyers; consult with a lawyer specializing in defamation for more precise information.

The Cost of Damages

Damages awarded for a defamation suit can vary significantly depending on the situation, but tend to fall within a specific range.

At the low end, for individual, small-scale defamation suits, damages can range from $10,000 to $40,000. The middle range for damages is between $40,000 and $80,000, and higher judgments can reach $150,000. Judgments of $200,000 or more do happen but are quite rare.

“The experience of the past ten years confirms that very large damages in defamation cases in British Columbia are relatively rare. We can count only five cases since 2001 in which the damage awards were $200,000 or higher.

In contrast, most damage awards for defamation in this Province remain between $10,000 to $40,000 at the lower end of the range and up to $150,000 at the higher end of what we refer to as the “conventional range”. The overwhelming majority of assessments fall within the “low” ($10,000 to $40,000) and “mid-level” ($60,000 to $80,000) range, with relatively few at the higher level ($100,000 to $150,000).” – Mondaq.

Cost of Damages

Generally, the deciding factors are these two: the scale of the defamation and the intent behind it. One individual defaming another on social media is much less likely to result in significant damages than a major syndicated publication publishing libelous content, especially if that content includes a willful intent to defame.

In some cases, a defamation case can escalate into a criminal case, particularly when the defendant is responsible for more severe actions along with defamation. The case of R vs. Simoes is one such example.

The truth is, winning a defamation lawsuit can result in anything from an injunction to have the content removed, to significant financial damages and jail time for the defendant, and there are too many factors to make a single value assignment for the outcome of a given case, especially without details of the situation on hand.

Anti-SLAPP Laws and Protected Criticism

One of the greatest challenges in a defamation lawsuit is proving actual defamation and avoiding the various free speech protections available to everyone. As described in our guide to defamation, even proving that a statement is defamatory (rather than opinion, insult, or parody) is a tall order. There are several defenses against defamation accusations, including:

  • Truth. A statement can only be defamatory if it’s not true. If you’re accusing someone of defamation, you typically must be able to cast doubt on their statements and require them to provide proof.
  • Fair Comment. A statement of opinion is not defamation, as opinion cannot be rigorously proven true or false. However, the “opinion” must be plausible to hold without malice or ill intent.
  • Responsible Communication. “Libel Chill” is the use of libel accusations to chill or suppress criticism. This typically requires that the defendant be able to prove having done their due diligence before publishing the defamatory content. This is also closely related to SLAPP.

Moreover, Anti-SLAPP laws may protect the defendant, particularly in cases where the defendant is an individual and the plaintiff is a company or other entity.

Anti-Slapp Laws

SLAPP stands for Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation. The idea is that, without protections, a company or individual with significant money and resources could threaten to sue, or actually sue, anyone they wanted about any negative statement. Even if no court case ever makes it to court, the threat of a lawsuit is enough to suppress discussion and criticism.

Anti-SLAPP laws protect criticism from these kinds of lawsuits by turning them around. Should the plaintiff be found to be using defamation lawsuits to suppress criticism, they can instead be forced to pay damages to the defendant for their abuse of the legal system. These damages can be significant, with one example leaving the plaintiff with a $164,186 bill.

The Supreme Court of Canada weighed in on SLAPP relatively recently, as well.

Is a Defamation Lawsuit Worthwhile?

Defamation lawsuits have high costs upfront in hiring a lawyer, court fees, filing fees, and other associated costs.

Moreover, they have significant risks. While you may win your suit, the results of the suit may not be to your liking. Furthermore, there’s always the risk of the Streisand Effect taking place, and the lawsuit’s news coverage promoting the defamatory statements more than ignoring them would ever have done.

On top of that, in some cases, you may even run the risk of a judgment against you if you can’t prove defamation or if the situation falls under the anti-SLAPP umbrella.

All of this can be quite a risk, particularly for individuals and small businesses. Is it worth it to pursue a defamation lawsuit?

The answer is a cautious yes, but only as an absolute last resort.

Filing Defamation Lawsuit

There are many other options you can pursue prior to resorting to legal action. You can leverage SEO to promote positive content to outweigh negative content. You can solicit testimonials and build a positive reputation that suppresses the negatives.

In many cases, defamation isn’t going to cause significant harm. It can be stressful, but much of the damage is intangible and difficult to quantify, and takes the form of lost opportunities you might never know you had. While this is terrible, it’s not life-destroying.

In these cases, it’s generally better to begin with reputation management. Businesses looking to remove unwarranted criticism can benefit from online reputation management services. Individuals can use ORM as an alternative to cyber libel and other lawsuits.

The fact is, lawsuits are time-consuming, costly, and risky. There are almost always better options to pursue long before getting the courts involved. If you’re wondering if your situation warrants reputation management or a trip to your local defamation lawyer, give us a call or drop us a line, and we can discuss your case and offer our recommendations.

Additionally, if you have any other questions about reputation management or the services we can provide for you, please feel free to reach out and contact us at any time. We would be honored to assist you however we can.

    Get Free Reputation Management Tips to Your Inbox!


    Spread the love

    Matt Earle

    Founder & President

    Matt Earle, Founder of Reputation.ca, is a leading Canadian expert on online reputation management with over 15 years of hands on experience working in the space. Mr. Earle’s educational background includes an H.BSc from the University of Toronto and certification as a Google Professional. His expertise has been acknowledged through national television appearances on CBC, PBS and CTV, being a guest host on CBC radio, and numerous quotes in print and online media.