Wikipedia services · Reputation.ca
Wikipedia editing.
Clear facts.
Credible sources.
Create a well-researched page or address inaccuracies in an existing article. Our Canadian team helps you understand what is possible, then builds a neutral, properly sourced approach.
- Page creation and eligibility assessments
- Factual corrections and existing-page updates
- Research, neutral writing and source review
Wikipedia is independently edited. Approval, publication and the continued inclusion of any edit cannot be guaranteed.
Start with a conversation
Tell us about your Wikipedia needs.
Request pricing and next steps for a new page or an existing article.
Prefer to talk? 1 (888) 505-5023
Toll free in Canada and the United States.
Our Google review rating
Reputation.ca
The right help for your situation
A new page. An outdated article.
A clearer next step.
Wikipedia work begins with the evidence. We assess the subject, the available coverage and the changes you have in mind before recommending an approach.
Wikipedia page creation
Find out whether a person or company has the independent coverage needed for a standalone article. Where the sources support it, we research and draft a balanced page for review.
Editing & factual updates
Address outdated details, factual errors and missing context with reliable citations. Proposed changes should improve accuracy and balance, rather than turn an article into a promotion.
Article & source review
Understand a declined draft, disputed claim or difficult edit history. We identify gaps in sourcing and explain which next steps are realistic under Wikipedia’s guidelines.
An honest assessment comes first
Know what can be supported before you invest.
A strong Wikipedia approach depends on independent reporting and neutral language. Your website, a press release or a preferred version of events may not be enough.
Discuss your page: 1 (888) 505-5023What we look at
- Significant coverage in reliable, independent sources
- The article’s current content, citations and edit history
- Whether proposed changes are factual, relevant and balanced
- Notability, conflict-of-interest and paid-contribution requirements
Confidentiality in our consultation does not replace Wikipedia’s disclosure requirements. Wikipedia’s community makes the final editorial decisions.
Working with our team
Careful research.
A clear proposal.
Start with a conversation about the person, company or article. We’ll discuss the available evidence, what’s realistic and the scope and pricing of the work.
Our researchers examine independent coverage and the article’s history to identify reliable citations. Those findings shape a neutral draft or a focused proposal for correcting existing content.
You’ll have the opportunity to flag factual issues before we support the agreed submission or edit-request process. We then respond to editorial feedback, with Wikipedia’s editors deciding what is accepted.
Wikipedia situations
Does one of these sound familiar?
Client confidentiality matters. These illustrative scenarios explain how an engagement could be approached; they are not client testimonials or claims of results.
A company ready for its first page
The situation: A business has years of independent media coverage but no Wikipedia article.
The approach: Assess notability, separate substantial reporting from promotional coverage and prepare a neutral draft if the sources support one.
A biography that needs updating
The situation: An executive’s article lists an outdated role and omits a well-documented career milestone.
The approach: Check independent sources and prepare precise, cited update requests through the appropriate review process.
An article with disputed context
The situation: A company believes an article gives an old event disproportionate weight or contains a factual error.
The approach: Review the sources and article history, distinguish verifiable errors from disagreement and propose balanced corrections where justified.
Your questions, answered
Before you get started.
Can you guarantee a page will be published?
No. Wikipedia’s editors decide whether a draft or edit meets its standards, and other editors can later revise or remove content. We focus on research, neutral writing and a realistic assessment of the available evidence.
Can you remove negative information from Wikipedia?
Unfavourable information is not automatically inappropriate. Corrections or removal requests need a policy-based reason, such as an unsupported claim or unreliable sourcing. Accurate, relevant and properly sourced material may remain.
What should I bring to the first conversation?
Have the article URL, a short explanation of your concern and any independent news coverage or reliable sources available. For a new page, share the subject’s name and substantial coverage from publications independent of the subject.
Is our consultation confidential?
We treat your inquiry and project discussions confidentially. Work on Wikipedia itself is public and must follow applicable conflict-of-interest and paid-contribution disclosure requirements.
How much does Wikipedia work cost, and how long does it take?
The scope depends on the sources, the article history and whether you need research, a new draft or corrections. We discuss pricing and an estimated timeline after assessment. Wikipedia’s editorial review timing is outside our control.
Let’s discuss your page
Start with clarity.
Build on credible sources.
Get a practical assessment of your Wikipedia needs and a clear explanation of the next steps.
Independent service provided by Reputation.ca. Not affiliated with Wikipedia or the Wikimedia Foundation.
